I find it very hard to fathom the arrogance of a person who desires a jaguar for a household pet, but they exist, and in huge numbers in Latin America. Pumas, ocelots and jaguars are hunted for the black market sale as fur, as pets, or to circuses and zoos, as are various species of monkeys and small animals who are also sold to medical laboratories for use as test animals - these small beings are sacrificed in the cruelest ways, not for the development of ground-breaking cancer or HIV treatments, but rather to test the potency of our household cleaners, cosmetics and toiletries.
I had arrived in the small village of Villa Tunari to visit the animal refuge of Inti Wara Yassi, sitting at the border of the jungle zones, and home to 1,200 animals brought here by owners who could no longer manage their jungle pet, rescued from cruel zoos, circuses or laboratories, or found abandoned. The refuge acts to rehabilitate as many animals as possible and release them back into the wild - usually a long and detailed process requiring a lot of time and resources - and acts completely without governmental support, run entirely from international donations and international volunteers, with a skeleton staff of four paid Bolivian vets and one manager. The conditions are basic and the work is carried out with a lot of creativity and compromise on a relatively small piece of land, largely owned by the local council. The local council's permission of land use comes with heavy strings attached - the refuge must be partially open to tourism, with the entrance fee charged being payable back to the local council. Very little support for the concept of wilderness exists here, and no enforced legislation for the protection of animals who are seen as another commodity with a surprisingly low monetary value (less than $20 for an ocelot?).
Three species of monkey live at the refuge - the small, shy and colourful Squirrel Monkey; the large, curious, and very "human" Spider Monkey and the rambunctious little Capuchin. Most of the monkeys were taken young from their mother and kept solitary for their confined lives (very unnatural for these social group-orientated beings), fed "human" food and, often, subject to horrible abuses. The rehabilitation process is begun from their period in quarantine where they are introduced to natural foods, to the jungle on daily walks and to contact with other monkeys. For some, this is a very frightening process and they cling to their human carers in terror - they are kept on leashes and the contact with the monkey groups is slowly increased until the monkey is accepted into, and accepts, the monkey group. The monkeys live together and are monitored until a natural group forms, with an alpha male and female, and the group is then weaned from human contact through a series of increasingly remote jungle areas, the last being restricted of all human sound and very minimal human exposure, until the correct governmental permissions are obtained for their release into the wild. Some monkeys have such severe psychological damage from human abuses that their behaviour is a danger to the other monkeys and these are kept in the quarantine area under a programme of enrichment where they are fed, walked and cared for by the volunteers and they can never be released, or even live free in the refuge's forests. This realisation, the severity of human induced harm to these small beings whose mannerisms and expressions are so wonderfully similar to our own was particularly painful for me - it is akin to abusing a child.
Birds and small animals have a much better chance of rehabilitation and release; unlike cats and monkeys they do not build as dependant relationships on humans and the rehabilitation time is only limited to their physicality, most of whom arrive at the refuge very malnutritioned. Bolivian jungles are home to the world's most beautiful species of birds - huge red, green and blue parrots and paraquets, toucans and macaws, and many others - they are usually hunted for sale as house pets, their wings are clipped, sometimes the bone is also cut, and they require nourishment and time to regrow, sometimes also requiring to be taught how to fly again. Birds caught from jungles are treated like cargo, transported in boxes without air, water or food - usually 80-100 birds per box, and 80 - 90% die during transport. This represents 20 birds killed for every bird bought on the market. Some birds have psychological problems meaning that they can't form groups and are cared for at the refuge, others cannot regrow their broken bones and are also cared for permanently here, under the enrichment programme. I was introduced to a pair of two beautiful red parrots, a couple, who remain at the refuge permanently because while the male partner can fly and, technically, is able to be released, his female partner is unable to fly and therefore he stays at the refuge with her - calling her loudly every time they are separated, even as they are just being brought out of their aviary for their daily walk along the tree branches. Perhaps the most beautiful love story?
2 comments:
Another wonderful post, Luisa. I'd like to be encouraged by the good work being done at the refuge (and eslsewhere), but it's hard to see attitudes changing to the extent that most people value wilderness above personal comfort and desire. Twenty dollars for an ocelot seems (is) obscene, but if they were worth $20,000 I'd hold out even less hope. Maybe the challenge is to find ways to make ocelots (and others) worth $20,000 when protected in wilderness, but nothing, or a cost, the moment they're removed from that home. How that might be achieved, I don't know (ironically, tourism, for all its evils, seems to head the list of possible ways), but you've got me thinking. Thanks, and good luck for your travels. I look forward to reading more, and viewing your great photos.
Hi Pete!
Nice to hear from you! I agree with your comments about the value of wilderness (or lack thereof). I can see how we can "monetarise" forests and jungles to retain a value in existence higher than in destruction (through the growing markets of carbon trading) but, like you, I am pressed to find the equivalent for the preservation of wild animals - high value "eco tourism" can attribute some value, but perhaps it's a problem that lies with our own spirit - we, as human beings, must realise that wilderness is as essential for us as it is for the creatures that reside in it. There is a beautiful book about the necessity of wilderness called "Deep Ecology" - it was the catalyst for Doug Tompkins to create "Parque Pumalin" in Chile... inspiring stuff.
Post a Comment